Roberta Smith
“Art in Review: Suzanne Mcclelland at Paul Kasmin Gallery,” The New York Times (April 6, 1996)
Suzanne McClelland continues to expand her riffing, loquacious
painting style, fusing language, gesture and material into
a hybrid of Conceptualism, Process Art and Abstraction. Three
of the six paintings in her new show (in the smaller of two
rooms) are especially good, showing new ways to use words to
push space and feeling around. Their signal characteristic
is a gritty emptiness and lack of color. The emotional-spatial
push-pull is accomplished by a relatively restrained deployment
of charged words across gently splattered surfaces that might
almost have been left out in the rain. This is an interesting
departure from Ms. McClelland’s more characteristic all-over
density of word and gesture, visible, and still effective,
in the remaining three canvases.
In one of the emptier paintings, called “Purfikt,” the
word “perfect” (spelled correctly) is isolated
in a little balloon that floats above a burned-out campfire
of word fragments, all of this on a surface of dusty, found-object
decrepitude. (It makes you think of Oldenburg’s “Street” pieces,
which Ms. McClelland may have studied in the recent Guggenheim
retrospective.) In the panting to the right, letters repeating “goodbye” are
ushered off the canvas amid teary little globs of synthetic
medium or are crowded into a narrow tunnel; both departures
are forced by a loose regiment of long spidery letters, spelling
out more goodbyes, that populate the left of the canvases like
ghosts.
Ms. McClelland’s accident-prone surfaces may owe something
to Sigmar Polke’s aqueous expanses, or to her new excursion
into photography. Also on view is a suite of 18 photographs
of the artist’s small, snail-like clay sculptures, their
surface supplemented with marks in chalk and crayon and washes
of gesso, creating visionary little worlds that again offer
a suggestive mix of media and feeling. |